Medical Marijuana Used Pot’s Emotional Connection to Spread Nationally
Authored by Vlad Grubyy
DENVER — Twenty years after California first legalized marijuana for sick people, “medical marijuana” has become a billion-dollar-a-year business so cloaked in emotion that it would be virtually impossible to dismantle.
Without any real national discussion, most Americans now live where it’s possible to get pot for pain, nausea or other ailments. Thirty states already permit some form of medical cannabis use, and several more are poised to approve it this fall — a sign this now-beloved industry has dramatically altered public opinion among both conservatives and liberals.
“I don’t care if you’re a Republican or a Democrat — I don’t care who you are,” said Kevin Murphy, CEO of Acreage Holdings, a medical marijuana firm with operations in 11 states. “If you have a brother dying of cancer, and this is the only thing that brings him comfort … you are an advocate.”
Millions of Americans believe that marijuana helps them. They say it relieves pain, improves their appetite and eases the side effects of chemotherapy. Others swear by it for helping with PTSD or anxiety or seizures. Millions use it just to sleep better.
But while emotions have helped drive legalization of medical marijuana, it has simultaneously become a big business. As many as 135,000 people are working in the medical pot business across the country, generating $1.8 billion in income taxes and at least $300 million in state sales taxes last year, said industry expert Matt Karnes of GreenWave Advisors.
Among the most recent high-profile additions to the medical marijuana industry: former House speaker John Boehner, who is joining the Acreage board after decades of cannabis opposition.
Those workers are buying and renting property, spending their salaries — and paying a significantly higher tax rate than traditional workers, thanks to an IRS ruling originally designed to fight drug traffickers.
All that has happened with a Congress that has taken only tentative steps to recognize the industry’s popularity and power and an executive branch that has refused to acknowledge that millions of Americans regularly consume marijuana in lieu of prescription medicines.
Lawmakers in March barred the federal government from interfering with any state-regulated medical marijuana system, but there has been no movement on plans in Congress to lower its classification as a Schedule 1 drug.
“As an industry, we have the opportunity to really get it right,” said Jen Lujan of California-based medical marijuana company Eaze. Lujan founded Weed for Good, which connects low-income sick people with medical-grade cannabis.
“We have the opportunity to destigmatize it, especially on the social impact side.”
Marijuana long has been present in the United States, and its use cuts across social and economic backgrounds. An estimated 24 million Americans ages 12 and older reported using cannabis in the past 30 days, according to a 2016 study by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Of those, 90% said their primary use was recreational, 10% said it was only for medical reasons, and 36% said they were using it for both.
Critics say statistics such as that prove medical marijuana systems have been exploited by young people who claim medical necessity to get legal pot.
Five states, including Utah, are considering whether to permit medical marijuana this fall. In announcing his opposition to granting broad access to medical marijuana in Utah, Gov. Gary Herbert said he worried that allowing medical pot “would potentially open the door to recreational use.”
It’s an obvious concern for marijuana skeptics, because every state that has legalized recreational pot started out permitting only medical cannabis and then expanded once people got comfortable. It’s a pattern repeated from Colorado to California and from Maine to Nevada.
And it’s a strategy not lost on Kevin Sabet, who is perhaps the country’s best-known legalization opponent. Sabet, who runs Smart Approaches to Marijuana, is a former senior adviser to the Office of National Drug Control Policy and a fierce critic of what he has dubbed “Big Marijuana.”
“They effectively changed the face of marijuana from a loser in a basement to your sick grandmother,” Sabet said. “It was, frankly, a brilliant PR move.”
Groups such as Sabet’s worry the nation has moved too quickly when it comes to permitting widespread marijuana use, especially when it’s wrapped in the cloak of “medicine,” which is routinely how medical marijuana advocates describe what they sell.
But those products haven’t gone through the same federal testing as real prescription medicine or even over-the-counter drugs such as Advil.
In most cases, users need only a doctors’ note saying cannabis would help them with the pain of cancer or nausea, leaving it up to the user and whoever is selling the cannabis to decide how much to consume.
Under federal law, doctors cannot directly prescribe marijuana because it’s still illegal, although they can prescribe marinol, a synthetic version of THC that users say is far less effective and much more expensive than real cannabis.
A large reason for the lack of studies is the heavy restrictions that come with being considered a Schedule 1 drug. That list also includes heroin but not oxycodone or other opiates, which medical marijuana advocates point out are far more dangerous to users.
And a small number of medically accepted studies have shown marijuana appears to be an effective treatment for chronic pain, nausea and symptoms of multiple sclerosis.
But the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine also warned of dangers from marijuana use: an increased risk of car crashes, lower birth weight babies and problems with memory and attention. It found strong connections between heavy cannabis use and the development of schizophrenia and other psychoses.
That’s enough to give Deni Carise pause. An addiction expert and chief scientific officer at Recovery Centers of America, Carise has no significant objection to medical marijuana use.
She does, however, object to the industry that has sprung up around pot, an industry filled with people who evangelize about the plant’s benefits without any solid scientific backing.
“The reality is that whenever something becomes cheaper and more available, more people are going to use it,” she said.
Carise said it’s highly unlikely the FDA would ever approve smoked marijuana for personal use, given the country’s experience with tobacco, which was once also recommended for a variety of ailments, including stutters and breathing difficulty.
Medical marijuana advocates, unsurprisingly, reject any comparisons to the tobacco industry. While smoking cannabis is the most obvious way to consume it, entrepreneurs unfettered by government regulation have figured out how to infuse it into foods and drinks, turn it into nanoparticles or extract it into oils and tinctures.
With hundreds of years of use behind it, marijuana may not be well studied by scientists, but it certainly has been tried in almost every conceivable way.
But because there’s no federal clarity, the states have been left to their own devices, forcing local officials to repeatedly reinvent the wheel to suit local sensibilities. At this point, it’s still illegal to move medical marijuana between neighboring California and Nevada, even though both states permit it
“We’re regulated somewhere between alcohol and nuclear waste. In many ways, they don’t even regulate pharmaceuticals as much,” said Michael Ray,CEO of Oakland-based Bloom Farms, which sells medical marijuana.
Like many of America’s marijuana entrepreneurs, Ray is willing to risk federal prosecution because he believes so strongly in the benefits of marijuana — and in the business opportunities that accompany it.
“Everything changes if the federal government decides to deschedule,” he said. “At the end of the day, I would love to see cannabis treated like any other industry. And that day will come. The big question mark is when.”